Digital safety case platform
Building safety.A clearer picture.
Bring assessments, evidence and actions into one connected workspace. Understand what is known, what needs attention and what supports each decision.
- Guidance-mappedStructure follows the GOV.UK safety case report guidance.
- Versioned evidenceEvery link points at a specific document version.
- Recorded decisionsNamed reviewers, dated approvals, immutable reports.
- AssessmentBSA-HRB-ENG v1
- EvidenceCompartmentation survey v2
- Open actionA-001 · due 7 Nov
- ReviewChanges requested · SC-5
- Safety case reportRevision 1 · issued
A folder of documentsis only the beginning.
A folder of documents is only the beginning.
The value comes from understanding how the information fits together: which risk it relates to, what it supports, what remains unresolved and who needs to act.
Uploading a file records it. It does not, by itself, demonstrate anything about the building. Linking it to a question, reviewing it and acting on what it says is where the work happens.
- Fire risk assessment
- Source
- Solent Fire Consultancy
- Version
- v1
- Owner
- H. Reilly
- Review
- Sep 2027
- Next action
- A-003 door access
- Compartmentation survey
- Source
- Solent Fire Consultancy
- Version
- v2
- Owner
- T. Okafor
- Review
- Aug 2029
- Next action
- A-001 fire stopping
- Electrical condition report
- Source
- Brightwire Electrical
- Version
- v1
- Owner
- T. Okafor
- Review
- Dec 2030
- Next action
- None
- Fire door inspection record
- Source
- Site team
- Version
- v1
- Owner
- T. Okafor
- Review
- Jan 2027
- Next action
- Review by M. Lindqvist
- Structural condition survey
- Source
- Hartwell Structures
- Version
- v1
- Owner
- T. Okafor
- Review
- Sep 2030
- Next action
- A-002 riser survey
- Each record points to a building, a question, an owner and the next step. Illustrative demo.
See how the pieces connect.
See how the pieces connect| Building | Reference | Applicability | Open actions | Safety case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meridian Point | HL-001 | Template applies | 3 | In internal review |
| Cotswold Court | HL-002 | Template applies | 4 | Not started |
| Alder Wharf | HL-003 | Template applies | 2 | Changes requested |
Know what supportsthe decision.
Know what supports the decision.IDENTIFY
Record the risk or question.
- IDENTIFY (current)
- CONNECT
- REVIEW
- ACT
1 · IDENTIFY
R-001 · fire spread
Fire spread between floors through unsealed service penetrations in riser cupboards
Location: riser cupboards, floors 3 to 11 · Rating: High confirmed by H. Reilly
2 · CONNECT
Linked to R-001
- Evidence: compartmentation survey v2 Awaiting review
- Control: riser cupboards locked and inspected quarterly In place
- Control: fire stopping programme Partial
- Safety case section SC-5
3 · REVIEW
Gap view
- 1 claim without accepted evidence (SC-5)
- 2 documents awaiting review
- 1 uncertainty: floors 10 and 11 unsurveyed
A documentation check, not a legal verdict.
4 · ACT
A-001
Complete fire stopping to remaining six riser penetrations
Owner D. Patel · due 7 Nov · priority High: breaches undermine the stay put strategy
OpenIn progressReady for verificationClosed
Evidencewith context.
Evidence with context.A passage in a document supports one specific record. RiskAtlas keeps that relationship visible: which version, which page, which question, who reviewed it and when.
4. Findings · Riser cupboards (fictional demo document)
4.1 Riser cupboards on floors 3 to 9 were inspected visually with limited intrusive opening of ceiling voids.
4.2 Twenty-three service penetrations were found without fire-resisting sealing. Seventeen had been repaired at the date of this reissue, with photographic records provided by the contractor.
4.3 Riser cupboards on floors 10 and 11 could not be accessed and are excluded from these findings.
4.4 It is recommended that the remaining six penetrations are sealed with a tested system within eight weeks…
Linked assessment response
FS-COMP-1
Has a compartmentation survey been carried out, and what did it find?
Answer: Partially · Evidence: v2, page 4 (4.2)
Reviewer comment · M. Lindqvist · 15 Oct 2026
"Accepted for this question. Please link the photographic record separately so the seventeen repairs are evidenced, not only described."
Accepted for this purpose- Uploaded
The file is stored privately with its metadata. Nothing is proved yet.
- Linked
A specific version is attached to the record it is meant to support.
- Reviewed
A reviewer has looked at the document and recorded a decision and rationale.
- Accepted for this purpose
The reviewer accepted it for this record. Not a statement about the whole building.
- Superseded
A newer version exists. Links to the old version are flagged, not switched silently.
Make the nextstep visible.
Make the next step visible.Open → In progress → Ready for verification → Closed. An action that needs verification is only closed after a second person records a decision.
A-001 · Meridian Point (illustrative demo)
Complete fire stopping to remaining six riser penetrations
Raised by H. Reilly (assessor)
Priority High: breaches undermine the stay put strategy. Owner D. Patel. Due 7 Nov 2026. Verification required: post-works inspection with photographs.
D. Patel
7 Nov 2026
Required
A short walk throughthe workspace.
A short walk through the workspaceFive steps using the fictional demonstration organisation. Move at your own pace; nothing waits for an animation.
Buildings
Export CSVAdd building| Building | Ref | Latest assessment | Safety case | Open |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meridian Point 17 storeys · 128 units | HL-001 | 7 Oct 2026 Submitted for review | In internal review | 3 |
| Cotswold Court 8 storeys · 46 units | HL-002 | 14 Oct 2026 Draft | Not started | 4 |
| Alder Wharf 12 storeys · 84 units | HL-003 | 28 Aug 2026 Reviewed | Changes requested | 2 |
Questions,answered plainly.
Frequently asked questionsAnswers describe what the product does today, not what is planned.